Outdoor industrial environments include industries such as construction and quarrying and are at high risk of excess hazardous dust exposure. This type of dust is referred to as construction dust. Construction dust is often a cause of serious ill health for many workers, causing diseases such as Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Occupational Asthma and Silicosis. 

According to the UK’s Health and Safety Executive (HSE), the term construction dust “is a general term used to describe different dusts that you may find on a construction site” and is also produced through similar workplace processes. These different dusts include silica dust, created when working on materials such as concrete or stone, wood dust which is created when working on materials like softwood, hardwood, or wood-based products and ‘general dust’ created when working on materials like limestone or marble. 

The main issue relating to construction dust is often the failure to effectively eliminate or minimise workers’ exposure to it, in and surrounding any outdoor industrial environment, as well as the methods taken to do this. 

A broad range of workplace processes taking place in construction and quarrying essential to the job, like crushing, cutting, and grinding cause general dust to become airborne leading to exposure for workers. Similarly, when grinding into bricks, extraction of rock and similar processes using silica containing materials creates respirable crystalline silica (RCS) which, when inhaled, becomes incredibly harmful to the lungs.  

Often, the scale of the hazard depends on varying factors, including time, location, and methods of working. If people are working on tasks for longer, in a more enclosed space or are not using effective control methods for the dust, e.g. dry sweeping the dust, they are more likely to increase their risk of dust exposure.  

In many cases, it’s difficult to completely eliminate or substitute materials causing excess dust, due to the materials being used for the job. Therefore, workplaces may work in line with the Hierarchy of Controls to introduce engineering controls to isolate and limit workers from exposure to the hazard by altering the way the work. 

Construction dust is a major issue for multiple countries. Worldwide, there are over 200 million people employed in both construction and quarrying industries, meaning there’s a high risk of all outdoor industry workers being exposed to occupational lung diseases. For example, in the UK, it’s estimated that between 3,000 – 4,000 construction workers per year suffer from a work-related breathing or lung issues.  

Construction dust can affect different areas of an outdoor site. When completing processes such as grinding and cutting, dust may be closer to the breathing zone for individuals, heightening the chance of inhalation of hazardous particles. In contrast, processes like crushing and extraction may produce a larger amount of dust, making it airborne and spreading further affecting an entire site. 

Because these mentioned workplace processes take place outdoor, this finite dust can spread across entire sites and even further afield. The Environmental Protection Agency estimate that particle pollution generated in one area of a workplace can travel hundreds or thousands of miles. 

For all industry workers across an entire site, construction dust is a serious concern. Whilst workers directly involved in construction or quarrying processes are most at risk, any workers in nearby office cabins, the local communities or members of the public nearby can also be at risk, due to the nature of finite dust becoming airborne and spreading further afield.  

In 2019, Joanna McNeil was employed by an Australian quarrying and construction materials company, where her office was located in a portable cabin. Despite being located around 100 metres away from the quarry, Joanna developed silicosis due to exposure to hazardous silica dust at the age of just 36.

Almost anyone located on and nearby a construction or quarrying site can be severely affected by exposure to hazardous dust, whether directly involved in the workplace processes or simply by just being located nearby the worksite. 

Indoor industrial environments are working conditions that can be more harsh than regular working environments, such as offices. These environments can vary from different types of manufacturing and textile processes to stone works and woodworking. 

Indoor industrial environments pose a variety of health and safety threats to workers. Due to the nature of the heavy-duty processes and materials used, exposure to hazardous dust is one of the most common threats to workers health. This can be any type of dust, from silica dust processed from stone, or wood dust, cotton dust and even combustible dust. 

All these types of dust pose a threat to workers, not only because they can seriously damage workers health in various ways, but also because they are difficult to manage in an occupational environment, with each dust possessing different qualities dangerous to worker health. 

Manufacturing and indoor craftsmanship, involving products such as stone, wood, textile – and even food – can produce high levels of excess dust due to the machinery, products and materials used. Each industry is at risk of different types of dust. 

Stone has a high silica content, and when drilled or cut into, can generate fine respirable crystalline silica (RCS) content – or silica dust. which, if exposed to, can cause lung diseases such as silicosis and lung cancer. Similarly, processes such as cutting and sawing in woodworking can generate both hardwood and softwood dust, which can lead to various lung diseases such as asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases (COPD). 

In textile processes such as mixing fibres (blending), separating fibres (carding) and reducing loose materials (drawing) creates excess cotton and wool dust. These dusts have been known to cause byssinosis, an occupational asthma and respiratory irritation. Cotton and wool dust is also known to poses a threat when it becomes explosive or combustible. Similarly, in food manufacturing, substances such as flour, sugar and dried milk are all explosible dusts. During processes such as milling, sugar grinding or spray drying of milk, these materials become much finer, making them combustible and at risk of explosion if the concentration of dust in the air is within the explosion limits or a source of ignition is present.  

Any indoor industrial environments, which depend on heavy-duty processes are at risk of exposure to hazardous dust. Unlike outdoor industrial environments, when dust is generated indoors, it is limited to an enclosed and somewhat confident space, with limited fresh air flow. The use of Local Exhaust Ventilation (LEV) is essential to ensure excess dust is well controlled in the workplace. 

However, according to the Health and Safety Executive (HSE), many employers buy LEV to protect workers’ health but find that it doesn’t work, because it may be the wrong type or because it may not be properly installed or maintained. There are multiple things to check when both installing and using LEV, like checking it’s working correctly for each individual job, to make sure it’s still working correctly if it’s been moved and that the indicators on the LEV are working as expected. This increases the risk of exposure to hazardous dust for workers in indoor industrial environments. 

Workers in indoor industrial environments are at risk of hazardous dust exposure. Whether working with high silica content materials, hardwood / softwood, or textiles, the processes undertaken are almost guaranteed to produce excess dust which has the potential to be hazardous and harmful to workers health. 

Gordon Sommerville worked as a stonemason for large parts of his career and was regularly exposed to large clouds of dust, including silica dust, on a daily basis, with limited personal protective equipment (PPE) or suitable ventilation to protect him. “At the moment in fabrication and workshop type premises, LEV is the recommended gold standard, but it’s far from fool proof.” Gordon said, when asked about how silica dust is regularly managed in enclosed spaces. 

Gordon continued “Many workers, myself included, who previously worked in enclosed sheds are now either sick or dead. I would suggest that any enclosed area where dust is created should be monitored and recorded by law.” 

Without suitable ventilation, PPE or methods to control hazardous dust suitably in indoor industrial environments, which are enclosed and confined in space, workers will be exposed to hazardous dust and subsequently lung diseases in their workplace.