There’s more than one reason why our state of the art, groundbreaking new gas detector, SENTRO X, is a game-changer for the industry and those who work in the industry.
Available in General Purpose and Intrinsically Safe to ATEX and IECEx certification standards, SENTRO X is our next generation gas detection technology, suitable for heavy-duty applications in construction, underground mining and tunnelling environments.
But what makes it uniquely different to our previous gas detection technology and other similar products currently on the market? Alongside OLED graphic display for displayed dynamic menus and gas readings, optional integrated A/V alarm beacon for local area warning, and multi-point flashing high-brightness LED visuals warning, SENTRO X offers the following game changing features.
A great place to start is utilising the services of a registered occupational hygienist. Have air monitoring undertaken on the premises to get a baseline idea of your risk environment with regard to dust and then implement the recommendations of the hygienist to start reducing your levels of exposure.
To support this approach and get the most from your investment in the hygienist, teams can use real-time dust monitoring technology to collect data about their workers’ exposure to risk.
Real-time monitoring will also notify them instantly if any alarm points are breached, which would indicate a failure in a control, or alert to a non-prescribed operating method being used by a worker.
Real-time monitoring effectively offers an extra layer of protection for the entire workplace. Rather than going into it blind, and depending on information from the hygienist, real-time monitoring supports all the work being done by the hygienist. Adrian also highlighted how personal real-time monitoring can be beneficial in a similar scenario:
“Personal real-time monitoring and the subsequent data has many benefits in the workplace. Not only should it be used in a multi-pronged approach to safety, but it can also be used as an educational and training tool. For example, by demonstrating best practices to workers, they can better understand how a subtle change in the way they complete a task can have a major impact on their exposure to risk from dust.
Real-time monitoring can highlight a worker who isn’t following the assigned procedure and is putting themselves and any others in the area at risk from dangerous levels of dust. And when information or alerts are displayed immediately on a screen, this adds real power to training efforts.”
Adrian also highlighted how important personal real-time monitoring can be, when engaging workers with the benefits of real-time data. If workers can see, in real-time, the dust levels they’re directly exposed to, not only do they know their workplace is taking care of them, but it’s also much more valuable than just being told ‘you’re at risk of hazardous dust exposure’ without any significant information or data to back it up. Adrian said:
“Personal, real-time monitoring gives confidence to workers that they’re being protected and that their employer is taking their health seriously. An organisations’ staff are their biggest asset, and this technology helps ensure that they’re being kept safe from harmful dust levels.
By keeping your employees safer, you’re also helping to protect your organisation by reducing the likelihood of negligence claims or breaches of safety legislation (and the cost implications and negative publicity that often come along with it).”
And it’s not just worker satisfaction and compliance, which adequately protecting your workforce through real-time monitoring can provide, as Adrian demonstrates:
“This real-time technology has been proven to lower costs for the businesses who implement it: at a car manufacturing plant in Europe, for example, real-time dust monitoring technology revealed that extractors were running too fast.
When they lowered the speed of the extraction units, they lowered their energy usage and costs. And at a large construction project, real-time dust monitoring technology helped regulate water suppression efforts, resulting in lower water and diesel usage, and reduced costs.”
So, is your workplace being adequately protected against dust? If you’re not regularly monitoring the effectiveness of your dust control measures and utilising the expertise of hygiene professionals, then you’re putting yourself and your workers at risk of hazardous dust exposure.
Deploying effective and valuable equipment is dependent on the job being completed, the workers using it and the environment the work is being undertaken in. Our very own Particulate Technical Product Manager, Adrian Eccles, discusses the effective use of PPE, when PPE is valuable to use and the Hierarchy of Controls.
We asked Adrian to explain where PPE fits in across the wider context of effective dust control in the workplace:
“Firstly, the Hierarchy of Controls shows that PPE is the last option when protecting workers from risk, meaning all other options – including elimination, substitution, and the introduction of administrative controls or engineering controls – should be investigated first.
It’s important to note that PPE is a broad term which can include anything from eye, hearing and headwear protection, as well as Respiratory Protective Equipment (RPE) such as masks. When asked about the most common use of RPE in relation to occupational dust, Adrian said:
“Often, teams are using disposable FFP3 masks for occupational dust. From my experience, companies will go down this route for one of 2 main reasons:
Adrian stressed that effective RPE is dependent on 2 things, and these are suitability and adequacy.
On the other hand, when we consider if RPE is adequate, we need to assess if it offers enough protection for the task at hand. Here, we’re looking to make sure that the Assigned Protection Factor (APF) of the mask or respirator being worn effectively reduces the concentration of dust in the air.
The amount of dust that’s in the air at any given time depends on a variety of factors, including the materials being used, the skill of the operator, and the environment where the task is being carried out. To understand exactly how much dust is in a given work area, you rely on air monitoring.”
This is where effective real-time monitoring equipment comes into play. Adrian highlighted the importance of knowing what you’re regularly exposed to, in order to then deploy the most effective RPE for the job, location and worker in question:
“Once you have the data from your air monitoring efforts, you check the EH40: the EH40 is a guide produced by the HSE that lists workplace exposure levels (WEL) for dust and gas. For example, the WEL for silica is 0.1mg/m3.
All RPE have a different Assigned Protection Factor (APF). For example, a disposable FFP1 mask has an APF of 4, a disposable FFP3 mask has an APF of 20, and powered respirators can have an APF of 40 (this information will be clear on the equipment packaging).
If your air monitoring showed that a worker cutting a kitchen counter had an exposure level of 2.6 mg/m3, you’d know that the worker was being exposed to approximately 27 times more silica dust than recommended, which means they would need RPE with an APF of 27 or greater. But remember, the goal isn’t to reduce exposure so that it’s just below the WEL, the goal is to reduce exposure to the hazard as much as reasonably practicable.”
When having to provide your workforce with PPE and more specifically RPE, it’s essential that it’s the most effective solution for the job being completed and the worker undertaking the task. Remember suitability and adequacy should always be consulted, for every different scenario.